OAK — OnChain Attack Knowledge

Worked example · 2020-09

Yfdexf.Finance liquidity-mining exit scam — Ethereum — 2020-09-08 to 2020-09-09

Loss
reported as about $20 million "locked" or taken from investors, a figure that traces to a ZyCrypto report and a CryptoWhale tweet dated 2020-09-09 and was not independently verified [forklog1]. Diario Bitcoin said more than $20M was locked into the protocol within a few hours [diariobtc1]. The project ran a pre-sale and liquidity-mining campaign, then its website, Medium page, Twitter and Telegram disappeared [forklog1][diariobtc1].
OAK Techniques observed
OAK-T11.005 (Operator-Side Fake Platform Fraud — the YfdexF.Finance project was a wholly fabricated DeFi protocol; the website, Twitter, Telegram, and Medium presence were deception infrastructure deleted simultaneously at the exit moment, confirming the platform had no genuine operational intent). OAK-T2.001 (Single-Sided Liquidity Plant — the YfdexF liquidity-mining pools were structurally single-sided deposit traps from genesis; the operator seeded the pools with the YFDEX token as the dominant side, and user deposits of ETH and stablecoins into the paired side constituted the extraction target; the pools had no genuine liquidity-provision function and existed solely to collect user deposits for the exit) + OAK-T5.001 (Hard LP Drain — primary; the operator team controlled the deposit-collection mechanism and withdrew user-deposited funds from the protocol's pools, converting the yield-farming deposit flow into a single-operator exit) + OAK-T6.001 (Source-Verification Mismatch — the project presented as a legitimate DeFi protocol with a Twitter presence, Telegram community, Medium articles, and a professional website; the operator deleted all of these surfaces simultaneously at the exit moment, confirming they were deception infrastructure rather than genuine community surfaces) + OAK-T1.003 (onlyOwner / Proxy Rug — the YFDEX token was created as the extraction substrate; the pre-sale and liquidity-mining token distribution was the access-acquisition channel through which user deposits were collected, and the deployer retained full control over the deposit-collection mechanism).
Attribution
pseudonymous — no named individuals or entities are linked to the operation in the cited sources.
Key teaching point
Yfdexf.Finance is an example of the short-window liquidity-mining exit scam sub-pattern: a yield-farming protocol promoted aggressively during the 2020 DeFi hype window, with a four-hour pre-sale "until the hard cap is reached", followed by disappearance of the project's website and social accounts within about a day [forklog1][diariobtc1]. The structural lesson is that launch-window deposit concentration + anonymous operator + no timelock or multisig on the fund-collection contract = exposed by construction.
Corrected 2026-10-11
Dates corrected (pre-sale announced 2020-09-08, project gone by 2020-09-09, not 2020-09-10); removed the unsourced token price trajectory (peak 0.1 ETH / ~$36), the "~200 Uniswap transactions", "49 addresses" and final-trade specifics, and the comparisons with Harvest, Compounder and UniCats; the $20M figure is now marked as an unverified reported figure.

Summary

Yfdexf.Finance presented itself as a DeFi liquidity-mining platform with a native token, YFDEX. The project announced its token pre-sale on 2020-09-08, with a stated four-hour window "until the hard cap is reached", unsold tokens to be burned, and a conversion rate of 12 YFDEX per ETH [diariobtc1]. It ran a two-day promotional campaign on Twitter and Telegram, offering prize draws for retweets and hashtags [forklog1].

By 2020-09-09 the project had disappeared; CryptoWhale's tweet calling it an exit scam is dated the same day, and ForkLog reported on 2020-09-10 that the website was offline and the accounts used to attract investors had been deleted; the project also did not pay for the promotion it had commissioned [forklog1]``[diariobtc1]. The $20M figure is reported as the amount investors locked or lost, and none of the cited sources verifies it independently or reports any recovery [forklog1]``[diariobtc1].

Timeline (UTC)

When Event OAK ref
2020-09-08 Pre-sale announced (four-hour window, hard cap); promotion on Twitter and Telegram (launch)
2020-09-09 Website, Medium, Twitter and Telegram disappear; CryptoWhale tweets an exit-scam warning exit
2020-09-10 ForkLog reports ~$20M claimed lost (reporting)

What this example tells contributors writing future Technique pages

  • Treat the $20M as a reported, unverified figure and record the deposit-window duration (here, hours to about a day) as a structural feature of the sub-pattern.
  • Unilateral operator control of the deposit contract with no timelock or multisig is the standing structural defect; the simultaneous disappearance of all operator surfaces is a post-hoc signal.

Public references

Techniques demonstrated (5)